Hernandez: An Uneasy Sleep

AAron smilingAaron’s Hernandez’s jury’s question had to have made the prosecutors toss and turn in their sleep, if they slept at all. As best I can tell it asked the judge according to this report: “questions to clarify two weapon and ammunition possession charges Hernandez faces in addition to the murder charge. Hernandez is charged with illegally possessing a .45-caliber handgun and .22-caliber ammunition.”

Another report has it that the jury asked “if the principle of “constructive possession,” one of the elements of both charges, means that Hernandez intended to use the firearm.” Judge tells the jurors that means he must have some type of control over it.

The nightmare the prosecutors had last night goes back to the decision to charge Hernandez with those minor charges in the first place. I never could figure out why prosecutors add in the minor charges in a murder or other serious felony case. The idea is to convict the guy or gal of the offense you believe was committed; throwing in the junk can give the jury a way out or confuse it so that it no longer focuses on what is important. A prosecutor should asked “will I be happy if the jury gives the defendant a pass on the main charge and convicts on the minor charges?”  

In this case it will be little comfort to anyone except Hernandez and the defense team if he is found guilty of possession of ammunition and not guilty of murder. The initial blunder in bringing this charge is the reason the jury asked the question. It should have been avoided.

But it is worse than that, much worse. It seems to suggest, and when I say this you must remember the way juries work is often inscrutable, that one or some jurors are having doubts that Hernandez did the shooting. If that’s the case, much of the prosecutors compelling evidence is being ignored.

If any of the jurors believe one of the other guys with Hernandez did the murder of Odin Llyod  – perhaps the one who was on the imagined PCP trip – then it is going to be difficult pinning this on the defendant who the defense conceded was at the scene of the murder but noted he was a confused young man of 23 who saw his friend murdered and didn’t know what to do about it.

(There’s no doubt Hernandez was confused. The trial testimony that went unrebutted was that he was a chain smoker of marijuana. As someone suggested, you have to wonder about the Patriots and the NFL drug testing system.)

Jamie Sultan argued the case for Hernandez. I remember him back in the ’90s as a young attorney who was very effective in presenting cases in a calm logical manner. It is quite an accomplishment if he has, as the question seems to indicate, in this pretty open and shut case taken the gun out of Hernandez’s hands in his final argument. That’s one thing the prosecution did not want.

If the jurors believe Hernandez did not have the .45 caliber Glock weapon that was used to murder Llyod – after all it was not found at his house during the search and the other two men with him had left and probably taken the gun with them –  it would not have been in the black bag that Hernandez’s girlfriend tossed into the dumpster since the defense cleverly came up with her smelling marijuana in the box in the black bag as the reason she threw it away something she had not mentioned before – then to convict Hernandez the jurors have to find that Hernandez was involved in a joint enterprise with the one who did the murder.

The problem with that is that a joint enterprise requires the participants to agree upon what is to happen. There is no evidence of an agreement especially if the jurors believe against all the evidence otherwise that some type of PCP mental explosion caused the murder. That’s difficult to do because it was Hernandez who was driving the car and drove his “friend” Odin to the place of his murder.

The deliberations of jurors can run amok. The questions can sometimes indicate little. Uncertainty is the name of the game. But had I been prosecuting that case I’d certainly not have slept a wink last night.

 

 

 

12 thoughts on “Hernandez: An Uneasy Sleep

  1. [url=http://www.brandiwc.com/brand-7-copy-0.html]素晴らしい見ているそれらを探して、セドナゴールドで高級なオメガスピードマスターは、ちょうどギフト2015年のオメガスピードマスタームーンウォッチと数えられた版。 オーデマ・ピゲ時計コピー 全く奇妙な響きのある名前ではないのを見て、本当にあなたがどれだけ美しいこの新しいパンダダイヤルオメガスピードマスタームーンウォッチのルックスに焦点のためのデザイン・インスピレーションを理解するのを助けることを無視します。2015年までにずるくバーゼルでリリースされて、この新しいオメガスピードマスターは、金の価格を出すことをそれらのコレクターのためのヒットになりそうです。また、オメガスピードマスタームーンウォッチの数えられた版39.7mmウォッチはまた、しばしば空間における「第1のオメガスピードマスター」と呼ばれ、と私のようなより良い名前が私がこのレビューのように腕時計を参照していますので。[/url]

  2. [url=http://www.msnbrand.com/goods-copy-4778.html]また1つの上位10位の選手はオメガ名人大使セルジオ・ガルシア(Sergio Garcia)、これはガルシアの第4回W杯。前に、彼はかつてデビュー2001、2004年と2005年の試合、今年は祖国を代表スペイン观澜湖までゴルフ会試合に参加する。ガルシアは2003年にオメガ名人大使大家庭も、今とオメガ協力6年ぶりに及ぶ。今年は手を携えてスペイン同胞Constancio塔ノ(Gonzalo Fernandez・Castano)と共に出場。ガルシア信じて優勝の鍵は相手を負かすことより、自分に「ここは何の優秀なチーム。実は、ワールドカップはいつも多くの優秀な選手が付いて参加し。私の最大の圧力から優勝自体を、私たちはこのために最大の努力を尽くす。ブルガリ時計スーパーコピー私は前に言った、ここには多くの非常に優れたチーム。私たちも一本の優れたチーム。もし私たちが私たちの才能を活かし、実際のレベルを打って、私達は優勝を目指す。」[/url]

  3. [url=http://www.gowatchs.com/brand-214.html]カルティエ 時計コピーよく知らないそれらのために、Ætherの腕時計は、フェニックスaz、家に電話をすると起動する店は、2012年には周辺の石の小川ストラップビジネスの延長として。レビューともう一つの非常に驚いたことを意味し、Æther石の小川のストラップをインストールして来るのを見て、いくつかのカスタム化オプションで利用できます。私のために、これまた超私の良いに興味があって、エキゾチックレザーストラップ(スミス&ブラッドリー遺産によって起こす関心)。[/url]

  4. [url=http://www.eevance.com/tokei/hermes/index.html]蒼井シンガポール上場グループ高登(Cortina)時計台に進駐して台北101が百坪以上トップ時計通りの後、中国最大の時計のディーラー新宇グループも、香港上場の新宇亨得利ホールディングスを名乗って台大いに腕前を発揮する。ブランド時計コピーしかも控えめに高雄両家オメガ大きいが、調査によると、台灣の市場を新宇認定を戦略的発展が予想される地域で、大きい10 – 20家を目指して。[/url]

  5. Dave: As I recall it, one of them, Ortiz I think, did “flip,” but his story was so bad and so unreliable he was discarded As a possible witness. This was Hernandez’ “crew” Heaven help us!

  6. There was no evidence of an agreement, there is no murder weapon, there is not much of a motive. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence yes. He was at the scene, he drove Lloyd there, he texted his friends to “get up here now” but I think they failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that AH pulled the trigger.

    Obviously one of those men shot Odin Lloyd, but no one is talking. It’s amazing to me that his buddies haven’t flipped on him yet. Was it a perfect defense strategy to only finger them for the murder in closing arguments because the prosecution wouldn’t have enough time to talk to Ortiz and Wallace and get them to change their tune? Or is it just a fact that AH’s buddies are more stand-up guys than anyone in Winter Hill or the Mob ever was.

    1. Dave:

      Good point as it relates to Winter Hill guys. One of them did try to make a deal but unlike the federals the state guys knew he was lying to save himself. Hernandez and his friends put the Mafia and the so-called tough guys at Winter Hill to shame.

      1. Yes, I forgot about that. Makes sense now that AH would try and pin the murders on the other two. Bridges have been burned.

  7. I thint the DNA evidence will sink him. Agree on defense Stumble. Why put Hernandez at the proverbial scene of the crime? Duh.

  8. Mr . MATT , would anybody be really shocked if Aaron Hernandez actually walks on the most serious charges against him ? I wouldn’t …..

    1. Guys:

      I would be shocked. The case is pretty strong especially after the defense counsel admitted he was there. For jury to believe PCP defense without any evidence seems way off base. But the questions the jurors are asking don’t seem to fit in with anything but a not guilty but as I’ve said often it is difficult to predict a jury.

Comments are closed.