Is Trump A Felon? According To Federal Prosecutors He Is.

There is a concept in the law that talks about accessories to felonies. You can be an accessory before the crime is committed; or you can be an accessory after the crime is committed. The accessory before is usually treated in the same manner as the person who committed the crime. The reason for that is the idea that the crime might not have happened without the accessories help; and, that by doing that there will be a deterrent to those who might want to help the criminal in planning his crime. The accessory after the fact usually faces much less punishment than the accessory before. This is because the crime has been completed and all he is doing is helping the person who committed the crime avoid detection. In the latter case there is a category of people who are protected by statute from being charges as accessory after the fact because of their relation to the criminal.  These are usually family members.

You will note to have the question of accessory come up there has to be a crime. Not only that it usually has to be a felony. What differentiates a felony from a misdemeanor is usually the seriousness of the sentence attached to the crime.

You have all heard of Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen. He became Trump’s lawyer back in 2006. He also became a member of the Trump business organization. His relationship with him seemed to involve real estate business dealings for that was the business that Trump was engaged in. Trump dealt with him for over a decade.

As we know Cohen is a felon. We know that because Cohen has pleaded guilty to several felony charges that were brought against him by the federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York and one charge brought by the Special Counsel. He is scheduled to be sentenced soon for his crimes.

Cohen pleaded guilty and cooperated with both federal prosecutor groups. Trump has called Cohen “weak” and suggests he is cooperating to get a lesser sentence, which is obvious, but Trump seeks to suggest that Cohen  is lying  about Trump’s involvement in matters. By doing that Trump does not realize how much that reflects back upon himself. If Cohen is so bad how was it Trump had him as his go to lawyer for almost a dozen years? Do we have to question Trump’s judgment of people if we believe him now?

Two felony charges to which Cohen pleaded guilty involved violating the election laws. The New York prosecutors have said that he did that because he was directed to do so by Trump. That would, as I explained, make Trump an accessory before the fact and subject to the same penalty as Cohen. Trump wants us to believe Cohen is lying about Trump’s involvement in that crime, I assume, but not about his having done it.

The crime in question is paying off two women who had affairs with Trump to silence them so that they would not disclose their interactions. One was paid directly by Cohen. The money trail is easy to follow and the prosecutors have clearly established it; the other was paid by a magazine National Inquirer for her story and the intent of the magazine was to bury the story. As witnesses to the last incident aside from Cohen the prosecutors have the owner of the National Inquirer David Pecker. The allegation against Trump is as an accessory before the fact he directed those payments to be made so that the women would remain silent.

There can be little doubt that Trump directed these payments to be made. A prosecutor would arrive at that conclusion by asking the question: “Cui bono!” The National Inquirer gained nothing from buying a story and deep-sixing it; Cohen gained nothing by funneling money to Trump’s one-stand squeeze. If they gained nothing they were doing it for someone else. Who benefited: Trump. Who violated the election laws to get elected: Trump.

Hard to come up with any other conclusion than that Trump has committed a  felony. That is, unless you belong to that group that shut its eyes to evidence and only believe what Trump says. After the prosecutors set out his involvement Trump said it: “Totally clears the President. Thank you!” 

I  wonder what president he was talking about?

11 thoughts on “Is Trump A Felon? According To Federal Prosecutors He Is.

  1. No crime existed. It is comparable to the Probation case in Boston. No illegality whatsoever. Don’t waste your time or energy on this non story. The President can’t be charged with a crime in office. Impeachment is impossible with 53 pro Trump Senators. If the House voted an impeachment, McConnell the Senate Majority leader wouldn’t even schedule a trial. It would be the Merrick Garland issue repeated. 2. Real crimes were committed in obtaining the FISA warrants. In leaking signals intel in the Flynn matter and the unmasking of private citizens. The Obama administration was a copy of the Nixon White House. No Russian collusion existed and this proves it.

  2. He can’t be an accessory without a crime. Trump has been using Cohen to buy off porn stars and the like for years to protect the Trump brand. It’s certainly questionable whether that becomes a campaign expense because he runs for office. The
    Payments were not from donated funds but his own money. This doesn’t mean he’s not a pig, of course, but everyone knew that when he was elected.

  3. Wallahi! Now the only question is whether Glorious Leader will depart the White House in a bathrobe, a straight-jacket, or, shackles. Could be, though, Trump might decide to go out with his boots on. Maybe, we’ll get to see how a shoot-out between the FBI and the Secret Service might transpire.
    Bourgeois society is choking on its’ own contradictions. How about those proletarian French folks! Sounds like ’68 is doing a return gig. It didn’t take long for the thoughts of Red Rudy make their way to America, and, that, was fifty years ago. Word travels quicker in 2018.
    All praise to the yellow vests. All power to the dialectic!

  4. About 25 women have accused Trump of various forms of sexual misconduct. The porn star and the Playmate of the Year got paid off because their stories threatened his presidential aspirations. These six-figure bribes were clearly election-related.

  5. Ho-hum. Every time an employee of Trump’s get convicted of a felony, he is “completely vindicated”. The next step is the son-in-law and Murder-Incorporated-Saudi style. Trump-“I don’t even know that kid. He had a very small role in the campaign.”

    1. [Trump-“I don’t even know that kid. He had a very small role in the campaign.”]

      He’s not pointing at his crotch when he says that, is he?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *