Should The State Protect The Brains of Young Kids?

() wisecatWe are a society that has abdicated our rights to looks after our children to the state. It happened so quickly that one hardly noticed. Any of you who were around for the recent birth of a child know that parents cannot take their child with them from a hospital until the hospital people decide that their car has the proper type seating into which to place the infant. The state forbids you to take your child home in your arms; you must have an approved container into which to fit the child.

I often wondered what happens to a pregnant single woman about to begin labor who drove herself from her small bungalow in the countryside to the hospital on the only means of transportation available to her which is her motor cycle. What happens when she want to take her baby back home on the bike?

What happens If the hospital won’t let her? Does the baby become the property of the hospital? Will it then become a nurse or a doctor when it grows up. Does the hospital give it to the state? If a woman who lives within walking distance of the hospital does she have to buy a car with an approved baby seat to get her child released?

It is unclear what will become of any such baby whose parents don’t show up and pass inspection. Fortunately the people I know did have a car got the stamp of approval and were able to maintain custody of their babies. That, of course, is only the first encroachment on your rights as a parent. Any of you with young children know the rules relating to taking kids in the car. In their early years they must be confined to the back seat facing backwards. That must be good for the development of their self-esteem.

After they are released from that drastic incarceration at age one or two they are allowed to face forward but are crammed into the seat like NASCAR drivers at the Daytona 500. When they suffer through the next couple of years like that they are released but still must sit into some type of special seat. Parents have no choice in the matter because failing to do this will bring the mighty wrath of the state upon them. I know it is only done for the good of the child but aren’t all state imposed mandates backed up by the same reasoning.

The people have let the state decide what is best for the children. The state gladly takes over the decision-making and acts. As we’ve seen with the automobile, even though the chances of an injury to the child are negligible the state acts to ensure that if one of those rare instances happens then the child is protected.

Other intrusions by the state upon our parenting rights such as requiring vaccinations and attending school. If you believe in the adage: “spare the stick spoil the child” you’ll only end up with a stick. Thus the question arises: Why is the state not doing something to prevent children from suffering lifetime injuries to their brains.

You have all read about the dozens of NFL players who have been found to have been suffering from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a progressive degenerate brain disease that manifests itself in depression, disorientation and aggression, caused by repeated trauma to their heads.

Now it is becoming apparent that there is a greater risk of developing CTE if one begins playing football at an age while the brain is still developing. A recent study found that former NFL players who participated in tackle football before the age of 12 were more likely to have memory and thinking problems as adults.

In my day we did not start playing tackle football until high school. Up to that time we had some backyard games involved in tackling but most were touch or flag football. I read an article the other day saying Tom Brady followed that path which might account in part for his continuing great skill.

Now kids are starting as young as five years old banging heads. Now that there may be a connection between kids under 12 playing tackle football and CTE isn’t it time for the state to take action. It must forbid it from happening. With all the other rules that exist I would think that is a no brainer to want to save the brains of young kids.

I know the people that make the football helmets will lobby against this. To satisfy them, the state could then go one step further to make kids safe in automobiles. It could make it mandatory for infants to be fitted with helmets for the ride home.

9 thoughts on “Should The State Protect The Brains of Young Kids?

  1. What precautions are in place in the boxing game? I’m recalling matches between five year olds, was it Florian Hall where I saw them?

    I have quite a few friends down here in Virginia that refuse to allow their kids to play football. But my chiropractor coaches kids, including his son, in a league starting at eight years of age. Maybe they are too small to generate enough force to damage each other’s brains at that age. I know that 12 year olds can. That’s about the age I was when ko’d in a football game.

    How long before Goodell is sitting in the chair being cross examined by politicians?

    1. Honest Abe,
      I am a veteran of that youth boxing program. Florian Hall was only once a year, and we called it the “Big Night.” It was the showcase event for the Saturday morning boxing program at the McKeon Post run by Butch Attardo, Cliff McDonald, DeLuca brothers (one became police chief of Duxbury).
      We would go every Saturday morning to the McKeon Post and they would make 3 or 4 boxing rings out of the chairs and have us spar according to age, size, and skill, rotating kids in pairs into the makeshift rings while teaching fundamentals in groups on the sides. The place was packed every Saturday morning with Southie and Dorchester kids in the early 70’s. Then at the end of the season….”The Big Night”….at Florian Hall…real ring…real announcer…real crowd….it was great.
      Only select boxers (each year) in each age group got on the card for the Big Night…..I made it one year, when I was 8, and lost my main event bout to my best friends cousin.

      Ironically enough, the front door to Florian hall is right across the street another landmark relevant to this blog.

  2. How about the lead in the bodies of kids from Flint, Mich? Definitely a responsibility issue for someone working for the Wolverine State. A mass lead poisoning allowed to happen by craven partisan bureaucrats taking orders from a flinty-soul’d Republican Governor. That’s a real abuse of authority.

  3. I was amazed when I first learned that the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (founded 1878) was based on the earlier formed Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (founded 1868). For a while, a dog or horse had more rights to be treated well than a child in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

    No one likes to be told what to do, especially those who refuse to do the right thing without being told and those who refuse to do the right thing despite being told. For the worst offenders, there are the Darwin Awards:

    http://www.darwinawards.com/

  4. I think Matt’s brain is an active barometer
    to the success of this program.

    this just in from the punchy mcglaughlin
    news wire service

    Did the FBI Kill My Father?
    02/09/2016 04:34 pm ET

    Anthony Colombo
    Author and the eldest son of Joseph Colombo

    Forty-five years ago, my father, Joe Colombo, the alleged boss of the “Colombo” crime family, and founder of the Italian-American Civil Rights League, was gunned down among a crowd of thousands in one of the most highly publicized shootings in New York City’s history.

    To the media and the FBI my father was head of one of New York’s infamous Five Families. To the Italian-American community he was an organizer and leader. To his family he was a great husband and father. As Joe Colombo’s son, who was responsible for my father’s death — and that the efforts he made for the Italian-American community have gone unrecognized — has weighed heavily on me for years. I finally decided I would write a book to address who my father really was, and to address who should be held responsible for his death. The book is based on my personal life beside my father, my in-depth knowledge surrounding his shooting, and what I’ve come to learn was a suspiciously flawed investigation into his death.

    At the time of his shooting, my father had made enemies of the FBI, the NYPD, and various members involved in organized crime. In many ways, my father’s shooting parallels the assassination of JFK. After all the shock and finger pointing, an official investigation embraced a “lone gunman” theory. And in both cases, the general public had serious doubts. Similar to JFK, there has never been any question as to who pulled the trigger, but the question has remained for over 45 years who pulled the strings behind the trigger man?

    My father’s life was a classic tale of rags to riches; he was a young boy from the streets of Brooklyn, who in 1971 was voted New York Magazine’s top ten most powerful men in New York and was also featured on the cover of Time. Tragically, at the height of my father’s influence, on June 28, 1971, he was shot while standing inside a press barricade at Columbus Circle a few hours before an Italian-American civil rights rally. The shooter, Jerome Johnson, was immediately subdued and handcuffed by police. Johnson had posed as a cameraman with official press credentials. Minutes after Johnson was subdued he was shot and murdered while still handcuffed and surrounded by a sea of NYPD blue.

    2016-02-09-1454982041-8245159-GettyImages_1239917881.jpg
    Jerome Johnson being carried to an ambulance after being shot by an unidentified shooter while in the custody of the NYPD.

    Chief of Detectives of the New York Police Department, Albert Seedman, led the investigation and within days made statements to the media alluding to the conspiracy involved in the shooting and it being solved. An excerpt from my book Colombo: The Unsolved Murder:

    “On Friday July 2nd four days after the shooting, Seedman called for a special conference with the city’s Chief Inspector Codd and Deputy Police Commissioner Robert Daley. Seedman had just returned from a meeting with a source in Brooklyn and reported excitedly, ‘It was a Mob hit! According to my information the contract was let by Gambino himself. The price was $40,000. Furthermore, Colombo is supposed to be the first in a series of hits. Next on the list are Mrs. Colombo and the two oldest sons. It’s to be a reign of terror, the object of which is to destroy both the League and the Colombo Mob completely.'”

    After a year of investigation the NYPD closed my father’s case saying Johnson was a lone gunman. This was a theory inconsistent with Chief Seedman’s previous certain belief that Johnson had not acted alone. The case was closed even though evidence showed Johnson was not capable of planning and executing such an elaborate plot alone. Johnson’s immediate murder after he shot my father also went unsolved. The truth is Chief Seedman still believed this was all a mob hit as he later printed in his book, Chief. Daniel P. Hollman, then the Chief of the Joint Strike Force to Combat Organized Crime, agreed Johnson had not acted alone, but disagreed with Chief Seedman about the shooting and stated to the press he believed Johnson was not a mob affiliate. He noted how organized crime members would never send a crazed gunman shooting into a crowd of women and children.

    Like Chief Seedman and Agent Hollman, I have not been convinced Johnson was a lone gunman. I believe, just as they both did, there was a conspiracy in Columbus Circle the day of my father’s shooting. The information in my book leans towards a more sophisticated plot arguing that certainly a conspiracy existed, but not one perpetrated by elements of organized crime. I know that not to be true. In the decades since the shooting not one mob informant, and there have been quite a few, has corroborated Chief Seedman’s or the media’s assertion it was a mob hit. An FBI plot to kill my Father? Possibly. Law enforcement’s involvement? Most probably. Why the FBI? Why law enforcement?

    My father was a number one target of the FBI at that time. He had organized the Italian-American community in a way never seen. Within one year my father, through the Italian-American Civil Rights League, forced the U.S. Justice Department to eliminate the use of the words “Mafia” and “La Cosa Nostra”, he shut down production of the film The Godfather, and rallied over 200,000 people in pickets and protests of the FBI. Despite the FBI’s belief my father was a mob boss, he had criminal cases against him dismissed, and even a conviction reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States with the help of a brilliant young lawyer, Barry Slotnick. My father was beating the FBI in the street, with public opinion, and in court.

    2016-02-09-1454978025-8939960-0000403993004.jpg
    My father (left with megaphone) and me (far right) organizing a protest of the FBI.

    The 1960s and 70s were a turbulent time in our nation’s history. Evidence of FBI illegal activities leaked in 1971 when an FBI field office in Pennsylvania was broken into and the “Citizens Commission to Investigate the FBI” obtained internal FBI memorandum, which outlined an aggressive program of domestic spying. The program known as COINTELPRO (short for Counter Intelligence Program) was exposed. Agents executing the COINTELPRO program had their direct orders from then FBI Director, J. Edgar Hoover, and were required to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize, and otherwise eliminate” anyone viewed as subversive. There is no question my father was viewed as subversive. I personally experienced how the FBI treated him, myself, our family, and anyone close to us. I have lived with the question for over forty-five years of how far would Hoover and his agents go to “eliminate” a target such as my father?

    FBI internal memorandum demonstrates the FBI’s concerted effort with at least one major media outlet, the New York Daily News, to vilify my father and destroy his reputation by running, “an article concerning Colombo and his associates, which will show just what a ‘bum’ he is”. The Daily News agreed to leave no “trail” leading back to the FBI. These efforts by the FBI failed. My father’s influence and power continued to grow. Is it hard to believe that the FBI, under then Director Hoover, would escalate the scale and scope of its efforts and utilize a more permanent method to destroy my father?

    I interviewed an ex-CIA case officer and asked him whether the FBI would eliminate someone of my father’s position and he confirmed during those times agents infiltrated organizations, conducted dirty tricks, psychological warfare, and used the legal system, break-ins, stalking, assaults and beatings for harassment. They inflicted physical, emotional, and economic damage, and he believed they would not stop short of using assassinations to neutralize their adversaries.

    Today we not only hear more and more about illegal activities of law enforcement but also are shown hard evidence. My book finally reveals the major inconsistencies and suspicious sandbagging of the murder investigation that certainly would lead a reasonable person to question whether, as I long have, that elements of the NYPD, or the FBI were either involved in the shooting, or at the very least didn’t want it solved. For example, Chief Seedman told the media during a press interview that the German pistol used to shoot my father was untraceable. Matching serial numbers in the ballistics report from the shooting, which was buried for forty years and only recently authorized for release, are revealed in the book saying something much different. It is clear the gun was in fact traceable, and, strangely, was missing from an NYPD evidence locker. Also suspiciously strange, infamous FBI informant, Greg Scarpa handed FBI agents a photo of a woman who eyewitnesses had identified as Johnson’s female accomplice. She was being sought out by the NYPD for questioning for assisting Johnson with my father’s shooting. However, the FBI buried her photo and did not turn it over to the NYPD. A clear obstruction of justice and evidence that they did not want this case solved.

    I am certain now more than ever that Johnson was not a lone gunman. My book offers the answers to the questions the media, the FBI, and the NYPD did not.

  5. One suspects the stringent diktats about child car seats is the result of strategically placed expenditures to public relations firms [aka lobbyists] and to politicians by manufacturers of child car seats. As ever, follow the money.

    1. Tadzio:

      Absolutely true. It was only within the last decade we all had to buy new propane containers. The requirements for the children car seats keep changing so that even siblings cannot use them if they are a few years old. It’s all teh American game of fleecing the consumer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *